{ "currentVersion": 11.5, "cimVersion": "3.5.0", "serviceDescription": "As stated in the HAF about mid-scale spatial extents \u201cSecond-order habitat descriptions are linked to bird dispersal capabilities in population and subpopulation areas\u201d (page 11, Stiver et al. 2015). A mid-scale boundary is not intended to represent a (sub)population boundary; rather, it provides a spatial extent that is appropriate for assessing habitat characteristics that may influence second-order habitat selection, such as patch size and connectivity (see Table 2 in the HAF TR). The scale at which that occurs is driven by the dispersal distances/behavior of the birds in the (sub)population. A mid-scale boundary may include only part of or an entire (sub)population depending on the size of the population in the area of interest. Likewise, the mid-scale boundary may need to extend beyond a (sub)population boundary to adequately assess indicators of second-order habitat selection. The extent of the boundary is more important than the boundary line itself. The mid-scale boundary should encompass the fine-scale boundaries and the site-scale assessment areas. Mid-scale boundaries are required to calculate and examine mid-scale habitat indicators as defined in the HAF, such as habitat availability, patch size and number, patch connectivity, and density of anthropogenic disturbance within patches. The boundary provides an ecologically-driven geographic extent at which these metrics will be measured.", "mapName": "BLM ID Sage Grouse HAF Mid Scale Areas", "description": "As stated in the HAF about mid-scale spatial extents \u201cSecond-order habitat descriptions are linked to bird dispersal capabilities in population and subpopulation areas\u201d (page 11, Stiver et al. 2015). A mid-scale boundary is not intended to represent a (sub)population boundary; rather, it provides a spatial extent that is appropriate for assessing habitat characteristics that may influence second-order habitat selection, such as patch size and connectivity (see Table 2 in the HAF TR). The scale at which that occurs is driven by the dispersal distances/behavior of the birds in the (sub)population. A mid-scale boundary may include only part of or an entire (sub)population depending on the size of the population in the area of interest. Likewise, the mid-scale boundary may need to extend beyond a (sub)population boundary to adequately assess indicators of second-order habitat selection. The extent of the boundary is more important than the boundary line itself. The mid-scale boundary should encompass the fine-scale boundaries and the site-scale assessment areas. Mid-scale boundaries are required to calculate and examine mid-scale habitat indicators as defined in the HAF, such as habitat availability, patch size and number, patch connectivity, and density of anthropogenic disturbance within patches. The boundary provides an ecologically-driven geographic extent at which these metrics will be measured.", "copyrightText": "Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Operations Center (NOC)", "supportsDynamicLayers": true, "layers": [ { "id": 0, "name": "BLM ID Sage Grouse HAF Mid Scale Areas", "parentLayerId": -1, "defaultVisibility": true, "subLayerIds": null, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "type": "Feature Layer", "geometryType": "esriGeometryPolygon", "supportsDynamicLegends": true } ], "tables": [], "spatialReference": { "wkid": 102605, "latestWkid": 8826, "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 0.001, "mTolerance": 0.001, "falseX": -3120900, "falseY": -13447900, "xyUnits": 10000, "falseZ": -100000, "zUnits": 10000, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 }, "singleFusedMapCache": false, "initialExtent": { "xmin": 1869942.7080141613, "ymin": 916282.4323055965, "xmax": 2972914.3480858384, "ymax": 1676664.396294404, "spatialReference": { "wkid": 102605, "latestWkid": 8826, "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 0.001, "mTolerance": 0.001, "falseX": -3120900, "falseY": -13447900, "xyUnits": 10000, "falseZ": -100000, "zUnits": 10000, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 } }, "fullExtent": { "xmin": 2102854.7067, "ymin": 1017808.1217, "xmax": 2740002.3493999997, "ymax": 1575138.7069000006, "spatialReference": { "wkid": 102605, "latestWkid": 8826, "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 0.001, "mTolerance": 0.001, "falseX": -3120900, "falseY": -13447900, "xyUnits": 10000, "falseZ": -100000, "zUnits": 10000, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 } }, "datesInUnknownTimezone": false, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "units": "esriMeters", "supportedImageFormatTypes": "PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP", "documentInfo": { "Title": "BLM ID Sage Grouse HAF Mid Scale Areas", "Author": "", "Comments": "As stated in the HAF about mid-scale spatial extents \u201cSecond-order habitat descriptions are linked to bird dispersal capabilities in population and subpopulation areas\u201d (page 11, Stiver et al. 2015). A mid-scale boundary is not intended to represent a (sub)population boundary; rather, it provides a spatial extent that is appropriate for assessing habitat characteristics that may influence second-order habitat selection, such as patch size and connectivity (see Table 2 in the HAF TR). The scale at which that occurs is driven by the dispersal distances/behavior of the birds in the (sub)population. A mid-scale boundary may include only part of or an entire (sub)population depending on the size of the population in the area of interest. Likewise, the mid-scale boundary may need to extend beyond a (sub)population boundary to adequately assess indicators of second-order habitat selection. The extent of the boundary is more important than the boundary line itself. The mid-scale boundary should encompass the fine-scale boundaries and the site-scale assessment areas. Mid-scale boundaries are required to calculate and examine mid-scale habitat indicators as defined in the HAF, such as habitat availability, patch size and number, patch connectivity, and density of anthropogenic disturbance within patches. The boundary provides an ecologically-driven geographic extent at which these metrics will be measured.", "Subject": "These boundaries are used to conduct mid-scale (2nd order) habitat assessments according to the Sage-Grouse Habitat Assessment Framework (HAF) (Stiver et al. 2015). These data are current as of May 19, 2019.", "Category": "", "Version": "3.5.0", "AntialiasingMode": "Fast", "TextAntialiasingMode": "Force", "Keywords": "biota,Bureau of Land Management,Caribou-Targhee,Centrocercus urophasianus,Department of the Interior,GRSG,Habitat Assessment Framework,Idaho,Nevada,Oregon,Sensitive Species,Western States,Wildlife,Wyoming" }, "supportsQueryDomains": true, "capabilities": "Map,Query,Data", "supportedQueryFormats": "JSON, geoJSON, PBF", "hasVersionedData": true, "exportTilesAllowed": false, "referenceScale": 0.0, "datumTransformations": [ { "geoTransforms": [ { "wkid": 108190, "latestWkid": 108190, "transformForward": true, "name": "WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983" } ] }, { "geoTransforms": [ { "wkid": 108190, "latestWkid": 108190, "transformForward": false, "name": "WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983" } ] }, { "geoTransforms": [ { "wkid": 108190, "latestWkid": 108190, "transformForward": true, "name": "WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983" } ] }, { "geoTransforms": [ { "wkid": 108190, "latestWkid": 108190, "transformForward": false, "name": "WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983" } ] } ], "supportsDatumTransformation": true, "archivingInfo": {"supportsHistoricMoment": false}, "supportsClipping": true, "supportsSpatialFilter": true, "supportsTimeRelation": true, "supportsQueryDataElements": true, "mapUnits": {"uwkid": 9001}, "maxSelectionCount": 2000, "maxRecordCount": 2000, "maxImageHeight": 4096, "maxImageWidth": 4096, "supportedExtensions": "FeatureServer", "resampling": false }