View In:
ArcGIS JavaScript
ArcGIS Enterprise Map Viewer
Service Description: <div style='text-align:Left;font-size:12pt'><div><div><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span><span>As stated in the HAF about mid-scale spatial extents “Second-order habitat descriptions are linked to bird dispersal capabilities in population and subpopulation areas” (page 11, Stiver et al. 2015). A mid-scale boundary is not intended to represent a (sub)population boundary; rather, it provides a spatial extent that is appropriate for assessing habitat characteristics that may influence second-order habitat selection, such as patch size and connectivity (see Table 2 in the HAF TR). The scale at which that occurs is driven by the dispersal distances/behavior of the birds in the (sub)population. A mid-scale boundary may include only part of or an entire (sub)population depending on the size of the population in the area of interest. Likewise, the mid-scale boundary may need to extend beyond a (sub)population boundary to adequately assess indicators of second-order habitat selection. The extent of the boundary is more important than the boundary line itself. The mid-scale boundary should encompass the fine-scale boundaries and the site-scale assessment areas. Mid-scale boundaries are required to calculate and examine mid-scale habitat indicators as defined in the HAF, such as habitat availability, patch size and number, patch connectivity, and density of anthropogenic disturbance within patches. The boundary provides an ecologically-driven geographic extent at which these metrics will be measured.</span></span></p></div></div></div>
All Layers and Tables
Has Versioned Data: true
MaxRecordCount: 2000
Supported Query Formats: JSON
Supports Query Data Elements: true
Layers:
Description: As stated in the HAF about mid-scale spatial extents “Second-order habitat descriptions are linked to bird dispersal capabilities in population and subpopulation areas” (page 11, Stiver et al. 2015). A mid-scale boundary is not intended to represent a (sub)population boundary; rather, it provides a spatial extent that is appropriate for assessing habitat characteristics that may influence second-order habitat selection, such as patch size and connectivity (see Table 2 in the HAF TR). The scale at which that occurs is driven by the dispersal distances/behavior of the birds in the (sub)population. A mid-scale boundary may include only part of or an entire (sub)population depending on the size of the population in the area of interest. Likewise, the mid-scale boundary may need to extend beyond a (sub)population boundary to adequately assess indicators of second-order habitat selection. The extent of the boundary is more important than the boundary line itself. The mid-scale boundary should encompass the fine-scale boundaries and the site-scale assessment areas. Mid-scale boundaries are required to calculate and examine mid-scale habitat indicators as defined in the HAF, such as habitat availability, patch size and number, patch connectivity, and density of anthropogenic disturbance within patches. The boundary provides an ecologically-driven geographic extent at which these metrics will be measured.
Service Item Id: 08b978f2de8d416f9d8bce48329d50c2
Copyright Text: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Operations Center (NOC)
Spatial Reference:
102605
(8826)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Initial Extent:
XMin: 2102500.4077327894
YMin: 971049.8129172663
XMax: 2740356.6483672103
YMax: 1621897.0156827343
Spatial Reference: 102605
(8826)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Full Extent:
XMin: 2102854.7067
YMin: 1017808.1217
XMax: 2740002.3493999997
YMax: 1575138.7069000006
Spatial Reference: 102605
(8826)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Units: esriMeters
Document Info:
Title: BLM ID Sage Grouse HAF Mid Scale Areas
Author:
Comments: As stated in the HAF about mid-scale spatial extents “Second-order habitat descriptions are linked to bird dispersal capabilities in population and subpopulation areas” (page 11, Stiver et al. 2015). A mid-scale boundary is not intended to represent a (sub)population boundary; rather, it provides a spatial extent that is appropriate for assessing habitat characteristics that may influence second-order habitat selection, such as patch size and connectivity (see Table 2 in the HAF TR). The scale at which that occurs is driven by the dispersal distances/behavior of the birds in the (sub)population. A mid-scale boundary may include only part of or an entire (sub)population depending on the size of the population in the area of interest. Likewise, the mid-scale boundary may need to extend beyond a (sub)population boundary to adequately assess indicators of second-order habitat selection. The extent of the boundary is more important than the boundary line itself. The mid-scale boundary should encompass the fine-scale boundaries and the site-scale assessment areas. Mid-scale boundaries are required to calculate and examine mid-scale habitat indicators as defined in the HAF, such as habitat availability, patch size and number, patch connectivity, and density of anthropogenic disturbance within patches. The boundary provides an ecologically-driven geographic extent at which these metrics will be measured.
Subject: These boundaries are used to conduct mid-scale (2nd order) habitat assessments according to the Sage-Grouse Habitat Assessment Framework (HAF) (Stiver et al. 2015). These data are current as of May 19, 2019.
Category:
Keywords: biota,Bureau of Land Management,Caribou-Targhee,Centrocercus urophasianus,Department of the Interior,GRSG,Habitat Assessment Framework,Idaho,Nevada,Oregon,Sensitive Species,Western States,Wildlife,Wyoming
AntialiasingMode: null
TextAntialiasingMode: null
Enable Z Defaults: false
Supports ApplyEdits With Global Ids: false
Support True Curves : true
Only Allow TrueCurve Updates By TrueCurveClients : true
Supports Return Service Edits Option : true
Supports Dynamic Layers: false
Child Resources:
Info
Query Data Elements
Relationships
SharedTemplates
Supported Operations:
Query
Query Contingent Values
QueryDomains
Append
Extract Changes
Get Estimates